Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
Date: 2023-05-24 18:55:59
Message-ID: 20230524185559.un4dqfem3u3ktons@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-05-24 15:38:41 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I looked at this again, and I think GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate)
> might do the trick, see the 0002 part.

Yea, that seems like the right thing here.

> Unfortunately it's not much
> smaller/simpler than just freeing the chunks, because we end up doing
>
> oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
> updatedCols = ExecGetAllUpdatedCols(relinfo, estate);
> MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt);

We could add a variant of ExecGetAllUpdatedCols that switches the context.

> and then have to pass updatedCols elsewhere. It's tricky to just switch
> to the context (e.g. in ExecASUpdateTriggers/ExecARUpdateTriggers), as
> AfterTriggerSaveEvent allocates other bits of memory too (in a longer
> lived context).

Hm - on a quick look the allocations in trigger.c itself are done with
MemoryContextAlloc().

I did find a problematic path, namely that ExecGetChildToRootMap() ends up
building resultRelInfo->ri_ChildToRootMap in CurrentMemoryContext.

That seems like a flat out bug to me - we can't just store data in a
ResultRelInfo without ensuring the memory is lives long enough. Nearby places
like ExecGetRootToChildMap() do make sure to switch to es_query_cxt.

Did you see other bits of memory getting allocated in CurrentMemoryContext?

> So we'd have to do another switch again. Not sure how
> backpatch-friendly would that be.

Yea, that's a valid concern. I think it might be reasonable to use something
like ExecGetAllUpdatedColsCtx() in the backbranches, and switch to a
short-lived context for the trigger invocations in >= 16.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-05-24 19:49:13 Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-05-24 18:14:08 Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)