| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION and WAIT_EVENT_BUFFER_PIN |
| Date: | 2023-05-16 01:01:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20230516010102.jwmsuaoynz6zfqmn@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-05-16 09:38:54 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:17:16PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > IMO the submission should include why automating requires these changes (yours
> > doesn't really either). I can probably figure it out if I stare a bit at the
> > code and read the other thread - but I shouldn't need to.
>
> Hm? My previous message includes two reasons..
It explained the motivation, but not why that requires the specific
changes. At least not in a way that I could quickly undestand.
> The extensions and buffer pin parts need a few internal tweaks to make
> the other changes much easier to do, which is what the patch of this
> thread is doing.
Why those tweaks are necessary is precisely what I am asking for.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirk Wolak | 2023-05-16 01:05:19 | Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-05-16 00:54:53 | Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 |