Re: pgsql: Allow logical decoding on standbys

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Allow logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2023-04-11 03:02:53
Message-ID: 20230411.120253.579856734111967616.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

> Allow logical decoding on standbys

This adds the following error message.

+ errmsg("logical decoding on a standby requires wal_level to be at least logical on the primary")));

We alredy have a nearly identical message as follows.

> errmsg("logical decoding requires wal_level >= logical")));

And we used to writte this kind of conditions, like "wal_level >=
logical", using a mathematical operator. Don't we need to unify them?

And, a nearby commit addds the following message.

+ appendStringInfo(&err_detail, _("Logical decoding on standby requires wal_level to be at least logical on the primary server"));

This is omitting the indefinite article before "standby". I'm not sure
what to do about it but feel like we don't need it here.

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/decode.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/decode.c
index 5508cc2177..beef399b42 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/decode.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/decode.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ xlog_decode(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx, XLogRecordBuffer *buf)
Assert(RecoveryInProgress());
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
- errmsg("logical decoding on a standby requires wal_level to be at least logical on the primary")));
+ errmsg("logical decoding on standby requires wal_level >= logical on the primary")));
}
break;
}
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
index 82dae95080..7e1f677f7a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(void)
if (GetActiveWalLevelOnStandby() < WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
- errmsg("logical decoding on a standby requires wal_level to be at least logical on the primary")));
+ errmsg("logical decoding on standby requires wal_level >= logical on the primary")));
}
}

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-04-11 03:03:01 Re: pgsql: Support invalidating replication slots due to horizon and wal_le
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-04-11 03:02:38 Re: pgsql: Add VACUUM/ANALYZE BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option