On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:44:58AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 7:29 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> > Replacing that with a six-element integer array would be a clear improvement
>> > and, IMHO, better than adding yet another function to the extension.
>>
>> I'd have no issue with that.
>
> Cool.
The six-element array approach won't show the number of dirty and pinned
buffers for each usage count, but I'm not sure that's a deal-breaker.
Barring objections, I'll post an updated patch shortly with that approach.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com