From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: fill_seq_fork_with_data() initializes buffer without lock |
Date: | 2023-04-04 23:23:38 |
Message-ID: | 20230404232338.ttae5jzqs3wm46ui@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-04-04 11:55:01 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Look at:
>
> static void
> fill_seq_fork_with_data(Relation rel, HeapTuple tuple, ForkNumber forkNum)
> {
> Buffer buf;
> Page page;
> sequence_magic *sm;
> OffsetNumber offnum;
>
> /* Initialize first page of relation with special magic number */
>
> buf = ReadBufferExtended(rel, forkNum, P_NEW, RBM_NORMAL, NULL);
> Assert(BufferGetBlockNumber(buf) == 0);
>
> page = BufferGetPage(buf);
>
> PageInit(page, BufferGetPageSize(buf), sizeof(sequence_magic));
> sm = (sequence_magic *) PageGetSpecialPointer(page);
> sm->magic = SEQ_MAGIC;
>
> /* Now insert sequence tuple */
>
> LockBuffer(buf, BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE);
>
>
> Clearly we are modifying the page (via PageInit()), without holding a buffer
> lock, which is only acquired subsequently.
>
> It's clearly unlikely to cause bad consequences - the sequence doesn't yet
> really exist, and we haven't seen any reports of a problem - but it doesn't
> seem quite impossible that it would cause problems.
>
> As far as I can tell, this goes back to the initial addition of the sequence
> code, in e8647c45d66a - I'm too lazy to figure out whether it possibly wasn't
> a problem in 1997 for some reason.
Robert suggested to add an assertion to PageInit() to defend against such
omissions. I quickly hacked one together. The assertion immediately found the
issue here, but no other currently existing ones.
I'm planning to push a fix for this to HEAD. Given that the risk seems low and
the issue is so longstanding, it doesn't seem quite worth backpatching?
FWIW, the assertion I used is:
if (page >= BufferBlocks && page <= BufferBlocks + BLCKSZ * NBuffers)
{
Buffer buffer = (page - BufferBlocks) / BLCKSZ + 1;
BufferDesc *buf = GetBufferDescriptor(buffer - 1);
Assert(LWLockHeldByMeInMode(BufferDescriptorGetContentLock(buf), LW_EXCLUSIVE));
}
If there's interest in having such an assertion permenantly, it clearly can't
live in bufpage.c.
I have a bit of a hard time coming up with a good name. Any suggestions?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-04-04 23:25:27 | Re: monitoring usage count distribution |
Previous Message | Kirk Wolak | 2023-04-04 23:22:59 | Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count |