From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix misplaced shared_preload_libraries_in_progress check in few extensions |
Date: | 2023-03-20 09:05:41 |
Message-ID: | 20230320.180541.96678678678426257.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Sat, 18 Mar 2023 10:26:42 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a patch to do $subject in autoprewarm.c and worker_spi
> extensions. The way it is right now doesn't hurt anyone, but why to
> fail after defining custom GUCs if we aren't loading them via
> shared_preload_libraries.
>
> Thoughts?
I don't think they're misplaced at least for pg_prewram. pg_prewarm
worker allows to be executed after startup and the variable is still
used by such prewarm worker processes, but the patch make the variable
stop working in that case.
I didn't look at the part for worker_spi.c.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-03-20 09:17:37 | RE: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-03-20 09:05:21 | Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields |