| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, lukas(at)fittl(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
| Date: | 2023-03-06 19:09:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20230306190919.ai6mxdq3sygyyths@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-03-06 10:09:24 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 1:48 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > At Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:24:25 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > > In any case, I think we need to avoid such concurrent autovacuum/analyze.
> >
> > If it is correct, I believe the attached fix works.
>
> Thanks for investigating this!
>
> Yes, this fix looks correct and makes sense to me.
Wouldn't it be better to just perform the section from the ALTER TABLE till
the DROP TABLE in a transaction? Then there couldn't be any other accesses in
just that section. I'm not convinced it's good to disallow all concurrent
activity in other parts of the test.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2023-03-06 19:24:09 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark (as CFM) | 2023-03-06 18:49:51 | Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |