| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Provide PID data for "cannot wait on a latch owned by another process" in latch.c |
| Date: | 2023-02-27 08:54:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20230227.175406.1010490272505798449.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Uggg^2
At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:53:08 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > Please tidy up the followging sentence properly and natural but in a moderately formal way, within the context of computer programs, and provide explanations for the individual changes you made.
>
> Please ignore the following sentense. It is an extra sentence
s/following/above/;
> mistakenly copy-pasted in.
>
> > +1 for adding that information, I'm afraid that MyProcId is not
> > necessary since it is displayed in log lines in most cases. If you
> > want to display the both PIDs I suggest making them more distinctive.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-02-27 09:01:37 | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-27 08:53:08 | Re: Provide PID data for "cannot wait on a latch owned by another process" in latch.c |