Re: pg_regress: Treat child process failure as test failure

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress: Treat child process failure as test failure
Date: 2023-02-22 20:33:45
Message-ID: 20230222203345.ajn7sxspmi7r3ns3@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 26 Nov 2022, at 22:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > I've moved the statuses[i] check before the differ check, such that there is a
> > separate block for this not mixed up with the differs check and printing.
>
> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b.

I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't seem
right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-22 20:38:48 Re: Improving inferred query column names
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-22 20:31:52 Re: refactoring relation extension and BufferAlloc(), faster COPY