From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Unlimited memory consumption with long-lived connection |
Date: | 2023-02-22 14:53:41 |
Message-ID: | 20230222145341.GT1653@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 21/02/2023 14:57, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > If I execute the attached python script against a postgresql 15.2 (Ubuntu
> > 15.2-1.pgdg22.10+1) server, with the default configuration (eg shared_buffers =
> > 128M), then the server memory usage goes up and up, apparently endlessly. After
> > about 10 minutes (on my laptop) pg_top shows RES memory usage for the back-end
> > handling the connection as greater than 1 gigabyte, which seems far too high
> > given the server configuration. The script just performs the same SELECT
> > endlessly in a loop. The memory is released when the script is killed.
> >
> > Platform: Ubuntu 22.10; Linux version 5.19.0-31-generic; x86-64.
> >
> > PS: The testcase was reduced from a script that kept a connection open for a
> > long time in order to LISTEN, and would execute a query using the same
> > connection every time there was a notification on the channel. It consumed ever
> > more memory to the point of crashing the postgresql server. Changing the script
> > to perform the query using a new short-lived connection was an effective workaround.
It sounds like the same as the issue here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items
There are patches proposed here, which fixed the issue for me.
But I've always been suspicious that there may be a 2nd, undiagnosed
issue lurking behind this one...
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210417021602.7dilihkdc7oblrf7%40alap3.anarazel.de
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-02-22 15:01:35 | Re: BUG #17805: Unexpected results when bounds of FOR loop use non-integer numbers |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-02-22 14:23:11 | BUG #17805: Unexpected results when bounds of FOR loop use non-integer numbers |