Hi,
On 2023-02-20 14:21:39 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I totally agree that it will be useful, but I'm not quite sure how
> checkpointer would be able to let postmaster know about that state
> without requiring access to shared memory.
SendPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_SHUTDOWN_CHECKPOINT_COMPLETE);
or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund