Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA
Date: 2023-02-13 20:32:40
Message-ID: 20230213203240.3vj265d2d2d2sgvh@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-02-13 14:55:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> bigdisk, bigcpu?

Works for me.

I'll probably just add bigdisk as part of adding a test for bulk relation
extensions, mentioning in a comment that we might want bigcpu if we have a
test for it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-13 20:45:07 Re: old_snapshot_threshold bottleneck on replica
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-13 19:55:45 Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA