From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry |
Date: | 2023-02-10 02:32:42 |
Message-ID: | 20230210.113242.699878230551547182.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 9 Feb 2023 11:38:18 +0100, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Hi hackers,
>
> Please find attached a patch proposal for $SUBJECT.
>
> The idea has been raised in [1] by Andres: it would allow to simplify
> even more the work done to
> generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros.
>
> Indeed, with the reconciliation done in find_tabstat_entry() then all
> the pg_stat_get_xact*() functions
> (making use of find_tabstat_entry()) now "look the same" (should they
> take into account live subtransactions or not).
>
> Looking forward to your feedback,
I like that direction.
Don't we rename PgStat_FunctionCounts to PgStat_FuncStatus, unifying
neighboring functions?
Why does find_tabstat_entry() copies the whole pending data and
performs subxaction summarization? The summarization is needed only by
few callers but now that cost is imposed to the all callers along with
additional palloc()/pfree() calls. That doesn't seem reasonable.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2023-02-10 02:33:37 | Re: ICU locale validation / canonicalization |
Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-02-10 02:32:05 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |