From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID |
Date: | 2023-02-08 06:33:16 |
Message-ID: | 20230208063316.atjv6uxb7owm77s6@jrouhaud |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:48:22PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I have a question about the possibility of simply getting the name of the
> currently executed function. The reason for this request is simplification
> of writing debug messages.
>
> GET DIAGNOSTICS _oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID;
> RAISE NOTICE '... % ... %', _oid, _oid::regproc::text;
>
> The advantage of this dynamic access to function name is always valid value
> not sensitive to some renaming or moving between schemas.
>
> I am able to separate a name from context, but it can be harder to write
> this separation really robustly. It can be very easy to enhance the GET
> DIAGNOSTICS statement to return the oid of currently executed function.
>
> Do you think it can be useful feature?
+1, it would have been quite handy in a few of my projects.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-08 06:38:14 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2023-02-08 05:55:10 | Re: A bug in make_outerjoininfo |