From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1 |
Date: | 2023-02-07 04:47:05 |
Message-ID: | 20230207044705.b462csjpi5rngso3@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-02-06 19:29:46 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> There's something off. Isolationtester's control connection emits *loads* of
> invalidation messages:
> 2023-02-06 19:29:06.430 PST [2125297][client backend][6/0:121864][isolation/receipt-report/control connection] LOG: previously emitted 7662 messages, 21 this time
> 2023-02-06 19:29:06.566 PST [2125297][client backend][6/0:121873][isolation/receipt-report/control connection] LOG: previously emitted 8155 messages, 99 this time
> 2023-02-06 19:29:06.655 PST [2125297][client backend][6/0:121881][isolation/receipt-report/control connection] LOG: previously emitted 8621 messages, 99 this time
> 2023-02-06 19:29:06.772 PST [2125297][client backend][6/0:121892][isolation/receipt-report/control connection] LOG: previously emitted 9208 messages, 85 this time
> 2023-02-06 19:29:06.867 PST [2125297][client backend][6/0:121900][isolation/receipt-report/control connection] LOG: previously emitted 9674 messages, 85 this time
Ah, that's just due to setup-teardown happening in the control connection.
FWIW, I see plenty of sinval resets even if I increase the sinval queue size
substantially. I suspect we've increased the number of sinval messages we sent
a good bit over time, due to additional syscaches.
As we only process catchup interrupts while in ReadCommand(), it's not
surprising that we very quickly get behind. A single statement suffices.
Anyway, that's not really a correctness issue, just a performance issue.
But the postgres_fdw.sql vulnerability to syscache resets seems not
great. Perhaps pgfdw_inval_callback() could check if the definition of the
foreign server actually changed, before dropping the connection?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-07 04:47:59 | Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2023-02-07 04:43:24 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |