Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Date: 2023-02-02 14:47:05
Message-ID: 20230202144705.nw7njv4l33wgud6a@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Dec-13, Greg Stark wrote:

> So here I've done it that way. It is a bit of an unfortunate layering
> since it means the heapam_handler is doing the catalog change but it
> does seem inconvenient to pass relfrozenxid etc back up and have the
> caller make the changes when there are no other changes to make.

Are you still at this? CFbot says the meson tests failed last time for
some reason:
http://commitfest.cputube.org/greg-stark.html

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-02-02 14:47:37 Re: Use windows VMs instead of windows containers on the CI
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-02-02 14:28:03 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners