From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgindent vs variable declaration across multiple lines |
Date: | 2023-01-20 01:31:37 |
Message-ID: | 20230120013137.7ky7nl4e4zjorrfa@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
There's a few places in the code that try to format a variable definition like this
ReorderBufferChange *next_change =
dlist_container(ReorderBufferChange, node, next);
but pgindent turns that into
ReorderBufferChange *next_change =
dlist_container(ReorderBufferChange, node, next);
even though the same pattern works, and is used fairly widely for assignments
amroutine->amparallelvacuumoptions =
VACUUM_OPTION_PARALLEL_BULKDEL;
Particularly when variable and/or types names are longer, it's sometimes hard
to fit enough into one line to use a different style. E.g., the code I'm
currently hacking on has
RWConflict possibleUnsafeConflict = dlist_container(RWConflictData, inLink, iter.cur);
There's simply no way to make break that across lines that doesn't either
violate the line length limit or makes pgindent do odd things:
too long line:
RWConflict possibleUnsafeConflict = dlist_container(RWConflictData,
inLink,
iter.cur);
pgindent will move start of second line:
RWConflict possibleUnsafeConflict =
dlist_container(RWConflictData, inLink, iter.cur);
I know I can leave the variable initially uninitialized and then do a separate
assignment, but that's not a great fix. And sometimes other initializations
want to access the variable alrady.
Do others dislike this as well?
I assume we'd again have to dive into pg_bsd_indent's code to fix it :(
And even if we were to figure out how, would it be worth the
reindent-all-branches pain? I'd say yes, but...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-20 01:43:44 | Re: pgindent vs variable declaration across multiple lines |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-01-20 01:28:18 | Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL |