| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |
| Date: | 2023-01-07 00:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20230107004525.GB789289@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:31:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed 0001 and 0002, which seem pretty uncontroversial.
Thanks!
> Attached is a rebased 0003, just to keep the cfbot happy.
> I'm kind of wondering whether 0003 is worth the complexity TBH,
> but in any case I ran out of time to look at it closely today.
Yeah. It's not as bad as I was expecting, but it does add a bit more
complexity than is probably warranted. I'm not wedded to this approach.
BTW I intend to start a new thread for the bugs I mentioned upthread that
were revealed by setting wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 1ms in the tests.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Imseih (AWS), Sami | 2023-01-07 01:59:40 | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2023-01-07 00:40:02 | Re: GROUP BY ALL |