| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Date: | 2005-04-26 14:53:09 |
| Message-ID: | 2023.1114527189@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Also, the blunder-on-regardless approach is popular in pg_dump, or so I'm
> told ;-).
Sure, but pg_dump scripts don't try to execute as a single transaction.
None of this discussion applies to the behavior outside an explicit
transaction block.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2005-04-26 14:54:39 | Re: btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-26 14:49:03 | btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-26 14:57:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2005-04-26 14:48:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in |