| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Kathy Zhu <Kathy(dot)Zhu(at)Sun(dot)COM>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: change NAMEDATALEN to 64 |
| Date: | 2003-07-15 04:21:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20225.1058242871@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:10:15PM -0600, Kathy Zhu wrote:
>> **** The question is, is it ok to fail this regression test since I do change
>> the NAMEDATALEN ???
> AFAICS this is testing the ability to correctly truncate the identifier
> length to 31 chars, so yes, the test is supposed to fail.
Indeed; see the changes to that regression result made between 7.2 and 7.3:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/test/regress/expected/name.out
Kathy, you might want to think about switching to a not-yet-obsolete
release ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2003-07-15 04:39:41 | Re: Are you frustrated with PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Raymond | 2003-07-15 04:18:58 | plperl language_handler Problems |