| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: add \dpS to psql |
| Date: | 2022-12-12 17:18:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20221212171822.GA202606@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:01:01AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-12-09 Fr 13:44, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Any thoughts on $SUBJECT?
>
> Yeah, the discussion got way off into the weeds here. I think the
> original proposal seems reasonable. Please add it to the next CF if you
> haven't already.
Here it is: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/4043/
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-12-12 17:24:07 | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
| Previous Message | Frédéric Yhuel | 2022-12-12 16:35:41 | Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? |