Re: Documenting MERGE INTO ONLY ...

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documenting MERGE INTO ONLY ...
Date: 2022-12-09 10:02:27
Message-ID: 20221209100227.7nglmpx2pha4rghu@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Dec-08, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:26:52PM +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > While testing MERGE, I noticed that it supports inheritance
> > hierarchies and the ONLY keyword, but that isn't documented. Attached
> > is a patch to merge.sgml, borrowing text from update.sgml and
> > delete.sgml.
>
> LGTM.

LGTM2.

> I didn't see any tests for this in merge.sql or inherit.sql. Do you
> think we should add some?

Ouch! We should definitely have some.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2022-12-09 10:09:38 Re: Documenting MERGE INTO ONLY ...
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-12-09 10:01:19 Re: static assert cleanup