Re: add \dpS to psql

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Date: 2022-12-08 04:43:14
Message-ID: 20221208044314.GD216874@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:25:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The fact that we just doubled the number of available bits doesn't
> mean we should immediately strive to use them up. Perhaps it'd
> be better to subsume these retail privileges under some generic
> "maintenance action" privilege?

That's fine with me, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's disagreement on
how to group the commands. I certainly don't want to use up the rest of
the bits right away, but there might not be too many more existing
privileges after these three that deserve them. Perhaps I should take
inventory and offer a plan for all the remaining privileges.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2022-12-08 04:48:20 Re: add \dpS to psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-08 04:25:32 Re: add \dpS to psql