Re: fix and document CLUSTER privileges

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fix and document CLUSTER privileges
Date: 2022-12-08 04:13:13
Message-ID: 20221208041313.GA216874@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 08:25:59PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Your patch makes it inconsistent with vacuum full, which is strange
> because vacuum full calls cluster.
>
> postgres=> VACUUM FULL t;
> VACUUM
> postgres=> CLUSTER t;
> ERROR: must be owner of table t

This is the existing behavior on HEAD. I think it has been this way for a
while. Granted, that doesn't mean it's ideal, but AFAICT it's intentional.

Looking closer, the database ownership check in
get_tables_to_cluster_partitioned() appears to have no meaningful effect.
In this code path, cluster_rel() will always be called with CLUOPT_RECHECK,
and that function only checks for table ownership. Anything gathered in
get_tables_to_cluster_partitioned() that the user doesn't own will be
skipped. So, I don't think my patch changes the behavior in any meaningful
way, but I still think it's worthwhile to make the checks consistent.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-12-08 04:19:00 Re: add \dpS to psql
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-12-08 03:37:47 Re: allow segment size to be set to < 1GiB