| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros |
| Date: | 2022-12-06 03:54:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20221206035445.GA2817362@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:45:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have applied the patch for the tab entries, then could not resist
> poking at the parts for the db entries. This leads to more reduction
> than the other one actually, as of:
> 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
>
> Like the previous one, the functions have the same names and the field
> names are updated to fit in the picture. Thoughts?
I might alphabetize the functions, but otherwise it looks good to me.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Isaac Morland | 2022-12-06 04:06:46 | Re: ANY_VALUE aggregate |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2022-12-06 03:52:21 | Re: ANY_VALUE aggregate |