Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
Date: 2022-12-03 20:16:17
Message-ID: 20221203201617.GA2647873@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 10:31:19AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> On 12/3/22 1:51 AM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Can we hard-code the prefix in the macro? It looks like all of these use
>> the same one.
>
> Good point! Done in V2 attached.

Thanks. I editorialized a bit in the attached v3. I'm not sure that my
proposed names for the macros are actually an improvement. WDYT?

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-generate-some-pg_stat_get_-functions-with-macros.patch text/x-diff 17.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-12-03 20:57:44 Re: Questions regarding distinct operation implementation
Previous Message Ankit Kumar Pandey 2022-12-03 19:57:40 Re: Questions regarding distinct operation implementation