From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation |
Date: | 2022-12-02 16:42:38 |
Message-ID: | 20221202164238.t73us2bxgohc7bvi@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-12-02 01:03:35 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On December 1, 2022 9:48:48 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I'd suggest putting in an assertion that the relkind isn't changing,
> >> instead.
>
> > Sounds like a plan. Will you do that when you remove the table-to-view hack?
>
> I'd suggest committing it concurrently with the v15 fix, instead,
> so that there's a cross-reference to what some future hacker might
> need to install if they remove the assertion.
Good idea.
> I guess that means that the table-to-view removal has to go in
> first. I should be able to take care of that tomorrow, or if
> you're in a hurry I don't mind if you commit it for me.
No particular hurry from my end.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-12-02 16:57:17 | Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-12-02 16:41:31 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |