From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: CI and test improvements |
Date: | 2022-11-17 04:08:32 |
Message-ID: | 20221117040832.sglsijzyttgv2i2i@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-11-16 21:58:39 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:48:14PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I've used this a bunch on personal branches, and I think it's the way to
> > go. It doesn't take long, saves a lot of cycles when one pushes something
> > broken. Starts to runs the CompilerWarnings task after a minimal amount of
> > sanity checking, instead of having to wait for a task running all tests,
> > without the waste of running it immediately and failing all the different
> > configurations, which takes forever.
>
> Well, I don't hate it.
>
> But I don't think you should call "ccache -z":
Agreed - that was really just for "development" of the task.
I also don't like my "cores_script". Not quite sure yet how to do that
more cleanly.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-11-17 04:16:31 | Re: CI and test improvements |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-11-17 03:58:39 | Re: CI and test improvements |