Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Date: 2022-11-16 06:55:48
Message-ID: 20221116065548.gdjfmjidh5zv42tf@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-11-15 20:48:56 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:29 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > If we want to focus on the mvcc affects we could just go for something like
> > snapshotConflictHorizon or such.
>
> Okay, let's go with snapshotConflictHorizon. I'll use that name in the
> next revision, which I should be able to post tomorrow.

Cool!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-16 06:59:33 Re: Small miscellaneous fixes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-11-16 06:55:33 Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()