| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Out-of-date clang/llvm version lists in PGAC_LLVM_SUPPORT |
| Date: | 2022-11-10 00:25:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20221110002548.4vc4g2wutaxhbycr@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-11-08 13:08:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I happened to notice that these lists of supported versions haven't
> been updated in a good long time:
>
> PGAC_PATH_PROGS(LLVM_CONFIG, llvm-config llvm-config-7 llvm-config-6.0 llvm-config-5.0 llvm-config-4.0 llvm-config-3.9)
>
> PGAC_PATH_PROGS(CLANG, clang clang-7 clang-6.0 clang-5.0 clang-4.0 clang-3.9)
>
> Given the lack of complaints, it seems likely that nobody is relying
> on these. Maybe we should just nuke them?
Yea, that's probably a good idea. Pretty clear that that should happen only in
HEAD?
> I may be missing it, but it doesn't look like meson.build has any
> equivalent lists. So that might be an argument for getting rid
> of the lists here?
The list is just in meson, it has a builtin helper for depending on llvm. So
that's not quite an argument unfortunately.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-11-10 00:34:26 | Document parameter count limit |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-11-10 00:15:12 | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() |