Re: Out-of-date clang/llvm version lists in PGAC_LLVM_SUPPORT

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Out-of-date clang/llvm version lists in PGAC_LLVM_SUPPORT
Date: 2022-11-10 00:25:48
Message-ID: 20221110002548.4vc4g2wutaxhbycr@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-11-08 13:08:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I happened to notice that these lists of supported versions haven't
> been updated in a good long time:
>
> PGAC_PATH_PROGS(LLVM_CONFIG, llvm-config llvm-config-7 llvm-config-6.0 llvm-config-5.0 llvm-config-4.0 llvm-config-3.9)
>
> PGAC_PATH_PROGS(CLANG, clang clang-7 clang-6.0 clang-5.0 clang-4.0 clang-3.9)
>
> Given the lack of complaints, it seems likely that nobody is relying
> on these. Maybe we should just nuke them?

Yea, that's probably a good idea. Pretty clear that that should happen only in
HEAD?

> I may be missing it, but it doesn't look like meson.build has any
> equivalent lists. So that might be an argument for getting rid
> of the lists here?

The list is just in meson, it has a builtin helper for depending on llvm. So
that's not quite an argument unfortunately.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-11-10 00:34:26 Document parameter count limit
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-11-10 00:15:12 Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()