Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault

From: Stefan Froehlich <postgresql(at)froehlich(dot)priv(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Date: 2022-11-07 13:47:10
Message-ID: 20221107134710.GA7369@static.231.150.9.176.clients.your-server.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:17:10AM -0500, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On 11/7/22 06:19, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> >Don't continue to work with that cluster even if everything seems OK now.
> >"pg_dumpall" and restore to a new cluster on good hardware.

> Why would that be necessary if the original machine works well now?

I can understand the idea not to trust hardware anymore once a (not
clearly identified) problem occured.

In this case new hardware would - for reasons beyond the scope of
this list - not be any more or less trustworthy than the existing
one and thus (IMO) not make any difference.

Bye,
Stefan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-11-07 14:02:26 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2022-11-07 13:17:10 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault