From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Requiring 32 bit atomics |
Date: | 2022-10-28 00:01:26 |
Message-ID: | 20221028000126.udcofvpnquh35rau@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-10-27 19:44:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Turns out they have a pretty cute workaround for it, on HPPA and a couple of
> other atomics-less arches they still support. They've written short
> sequences that have the effect of CAS and are designed to store to memory
> only at the end. To make them atomic, libc asks the kernel "pretty please,
> if you happen to notice that I've been interrupted in the PC range from here
> to here, would you reset the PC to the start of that before returning?".
That sounds roughly like restartable sequences in the linux world - a pretty
cool feature. It's too bad that it's not yet available everywhere, it does
make some things a lot easier [to make performant].
> Anyway, I think the big picture here is that nowadays we could
> assume that the platform offers this feature.
Agreed.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zheng Li | 2022-10-28 00:20:42 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-27 23:46:42 | Re: Requiring 32 bit atomics |