| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: list of TransactionIds |
| Date: | 2022-10-20 07:43:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20221020074355.jzqk7hdnz7qpuzc5@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
On 2022-Oct-20, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> While trying to use the newly introduced list_member_xid(), I noticed that it
> internally use lfirst_oid instead of lfirst_xid. It works ok for now. Just in
> case we change xid to 64 bits in the future, I think we’d better use lfirst_xid
> here.
Egad.
> Here is a tiny patch to fix that.
Pushed, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I can't go to a restaurant and order food because I keep looking at the
fonts on the menu. Five minutes later I realize that it's also talking
about food" (Donald Knuth)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-10-20 07:52:00 | Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables? |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-10-20 07:34:31 | RE: list of TransactionIds |