From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function. |
Date: | 2022-10-10 10:06:45 |
Message-ID: | 20221010100645.pfula2bpv56a6txm@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Sep-24, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru> writes:
> > [ v4-0001-Fix-logical-replica-assert-on-func-error.patch ]
>
> I took a quick look at this. I think you're solving the
> problem in the wrong place. The real issue is why are
> we not setting up ActivePortal correctly when running
> user-defined code in a logrep worker? There is other code
> that expects that to be set, eg EnsurePortalSnapshotExists.
Right ... mostly, the logical replication *does* attempt to set up a
transaction and active snapshot when replaying actions (c.f.
begin_replication_step()). Is this firing at an inappropriate time,
perhaps?
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-10-10 12:10:22 | Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-10-10 10:04:22 | Re: make_ctags: use -I option to ignore pg_node_attr macro |