| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf |
| Date: | 2022-10-08 17:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20221008171222.GB825354@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 09:57:02AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I would tend to agree that even membership probably shouldn't be involved
> here, and that this entire feature would be implemented in an orthogonal
> manner. I don't see any specific need to try and move to a more isolated
> implementation, but trying to involve inheritance just seems wrong. The
> status quo seems like a good place to stay.
Okay, I think there are sufficient votes against this change to simply mark
it Rejected. Thanks for the discussion!
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-08 17:15:07 | Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-10-08 17:06:40 | Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf |