Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2
Date: 2022-10-07 10:15:44
Message-ID: 20221007101544.546gjbl5x5g65zh5@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Oct-07, Amit Langote wrote:

> > Thanks for the heads up. Hmm, this I am not sure how to reproduce on
> > my own, so I am currently left with second-guessing what may be going
> > wrong on 32 bit machines with whichever of the 4 patches.
> >
> > For now, I'll just post 0001, which I am claiming has no semantic
> > changes (proof pending), to rule out that that one's responsible.
>
> Nope, not 0001. Here's 0001+0002.

Please note that you can set up a github repository so that cirrus-ci
tests whatever patches you like, without having to post them to
pg-hackers. See src/tools/ci/README, it takes three minutes if you
already have the account and repository.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-10-07 10:17:52 Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2
Previous Message Amit Langote 2022-10-07 09:56:37 Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2