From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Date: | 2022-09-17 21:42:10 |
Message-ID: | 20220917214210.GA3189289@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:54:14PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Here again, I'd rather put this off and focus on getting the "large
> details" in good enough shape so we can got towards integrating with
> vacuum.
I started a new thread for the SIMD patch [0] so that this thread can
remain focused on the radix tree stuff.
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220917052903.GA3172400%40nathanxps13
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-09-17 21:54:27 | Re: remove more archiving overhead |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-09-17 19:58:41 | Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names |