Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Date: 2022-09-15 20:25:14
Message-ID: 20220915202514.bkd5ihqoidwueghx@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-09-09 17:36:45 +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> I suggest we focus on saving the memory first and then think about the
> performance, if necessary.

Personally I think the locks part is at least as important - it's what makes
the production impact higher.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-09-15 21:14:20 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-09-15 20:03:17 Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage