Re: Minimum bison and flex versions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minimum bison and flex versions
Date: 2022-09-02 21:04:12
Message-ID: 20220902210412.o46qvyk2lfaem7fy@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-09-02 16:29:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-09-02 15:08:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> As fodder for discussion, here's a scraping of the currently-tested
> >> versions. (This counts only animals running configure, ie not MSVC.
> >> Also, my query looked back a few months, so some recently-dead
> >> animals are still here.)
>
> > All the other animals using bison < 3.0.2 are dead.
>
> Uh, what?

Argh, regex fail. I looked for a version with 3 components :/.

> I'd be content for now to set the minimums at 2.3 and 2.5.35.

+1

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-09-02 21:13:15 Backpatching nbtree VACUUM (page deletion) hardening
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-09-02 20:29:22 Re: Minimum bison and flex versions