From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |
Date: | 2022-08-30 09:20:08 |
Message-ID: | 20220830092008.6dbublx6la226zis@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Aug-30, Amit Langote wrote:
> Patches 0001-0006:
>
> Yeah, these add the overhead of an extra function call (typin() ->
> typin_opt_error()) in possibly very common paths. Other than
> refactoring *all* places that call typin() to use the new API, the
> only other option seems to be to leave the typin() functions alone and
> duplicate their code in typin_opt_error() versions for all the types
> that this patch cares about. Though maybe, that's not necessarily a
> better compromise than accepting the extra function call overhead.
I think another possibility is to create a static inline function in the
corresponding .c module (say boolin_impl() in bool.c), which is called
by both the opt_error variant as well as the regular one. This would
avoid the duplicate code as well as the added function-call overhead.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Syntax error: function hell() needs an argument.
Please choose what hell you want to involve.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-08-30 10:13:41 | Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-08-30 09:07:17 | Re: Letter case of "admin option" |