From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: windows cfbot failing: my_perl |
Date: | 2022-08-26 21:15:07 |
Message-ID: | 20220826211507.vaepb2nzlh3krxdg@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-26 17:05:52 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-08-26 Fr 10:47, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Given the crazy defines of stuff like free, it seems like a good idea to have
> > a rule that no headers should be included after plperl.h with
> > PG_NEED_PERL_XSUB_H defined. It's not like there's not other chances of of
> > pulling in malloc.h from within pg_wchar.h somehow.
> >
> > It's a bit ugly to have the mb/pg_wchar.h in plperl.h instead of
> > plperl_helpers.h, but ...
> It's already included directly in plperl.c, so couldn't we just lift it
> directly into SPI.xs and Util.xs?
I think it'd also be needed in hstore_plperl.c, jsonb_plperl.c. Putting the
include in plperl.h would keep that aspect transparent, because plperl_utils.h
includes plperl.h.
I don't think manually including all dependencies, even if it's just one, in
each of the six files currently using plperl_utils.h is a good approach.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-08-26 21:28:36 | Re: wal_sync_method=fsync_writethrough |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-08-26 21:05:52 | Re: windows cfbot failing: my_perl |