From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back) |
Date: | 2022-08-22 17:36:54 |
Message-ID: | 20220822173654.y4h2smhc4kpkvoeg@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-22 18:39:07 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> While working on the relation stats split into table and index stats [1], I
> noticed that currently pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes
> (or for index creation transaction rolled back).
Good catch.
I guess Horiguchi-san and/or I wrongly assumed it'd be taken care of by the
pgstat_create_relation() in heap_create_with_catalog(), but index_create()
doesn't use that.
> Please find attached a patch proposal to fix it.
Perhaps a better fix would be to move the pgstat_create_relation() from
heap_create_with_catalog() into heap_create()? Although I guess it's a bit
pointless to deduplicate given that you're going to split it up again...
> It does contain additional calls to pgstat_create_relation() and
> pgstat_drop_relation() as well as additional TAP tests.
Would be good to add a test for CREATE INDEX / DROP INDEX / REINDEX
CONCURRENTLY as well.
Might be worth adding a test to stats.sql or stats.spec in the main regression
tests. Perhaps that's best where the aforementioned things should be tested?
> @@ -2349,6 +2354,7 @@ index_drop(Oid indexId, bool concurrent, bool concurrent_lock_mode)
> CatalogTupleDelete(indexRelation, &tuple->t_self);
>
> ReleaseSysCache(tuple);
> +
> table_close(indexRelation, RowExclusiveLock);
>
> /*
Assume this was just an accident?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-08-22 18:16:56 | Change pfree to accept NULL argument |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2022-08-22 17:15:18 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |