From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strip -mmacosx-version-min options from plperl build |
Date: | 2022-08-22 15:41:34 |
Message-ID: | 20220822154134.o4ktpcrmfqc2ufdo@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-22 16:31:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 20.08.22 22:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Maybe a daft question: Why do want any of the -l flags other than -lperl? With
> > the patch configure spits out the following on my debian system:
> >
> > checking for CFLAGS to compile embedded Perl... -DDEBIAN
> > checking for flags to link embedded Perl... -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.34/CORE -lperl -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt
> >
> > those libraries were likely relevant to build libperl, but don't look relevant
> > for linking to it dynamically. Statically would be a different story, but we
> > already insist on a shared build.
>
> Looking inside the ExtUtils::Embed source code, I wonder if there are some
> installations that have things like -lperl538 or something like that that it
> wants to deal with.
There definitely are - I wasn't trying to suggest we'd add -lperl ourselves,
just that we'd try to only add -lperl* based on some Config variable.
We have plenty fragile windows specific logic that would be nice to get rid
of. But there's more exciting things to wrangle, I have to admit.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-22 15:47:00 | Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-22 15:37:40 | Re: Strip -mmacosx-version-min options from plperl build |