| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Date: | 2022-08-13 22:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20220813223646.oh2dkjrkj7jn7dpe@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-14 10:03:19 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I hadn't paid attention to our existing abstract Unix socket support
> before and now I'm curious: do we have a confirmed sighting of that
> working on Windows?
I vaguely remember successfully trying it in the past. But I just tried it
unsuccessfully in a VM and there's a bunch of other places saying it's not
working...
https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4240
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-14 00:48:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve performance of SendRowDescriptionMessage. |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-08-13 22:03:19 | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |