From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, minsoo(at)amazon(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns |
Date: | 2022-08-03 01:20:27 |
Message-ID: | 20220803.102027.1786766955594381576.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:54:43 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:00 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > + {
> > + int save_errno = errno;
> > +
> > + CloseTransientFile(fd);
> > +
> > + if (readBytes < 0)
> > + {
> > + errno = save_errno;
> > + ereport(ERROR,
> >
> > Do we need the CloseTransientFile(fd) there? This call requires errno
> > to be remembered but anyway OpenTransientFile'd files are to be close
> > at transaction end. Actually CloseTransientFile() is not called
> > before error'ing-out at error in other places.
..
> We just moved it to a separate function as the same code is being
> duplicated to multiple places.
There are code paths that doesn't CloseTransientFile() explicitly,
too. If there were no need of save_errno there, that'd be fine. But
otherwise I guess we prefer to let the orphan fds closed by ERROR and
I don't think we need to preserve the less-preferred code pattern (if
we actually prefer not to have the explicit call).
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-08-03 01:30:11 | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] is Done! |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-08-03 01:04:14 | Re: Slow standby snapshot |