Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests
Date: 2022-07-29 21:15:26
Message-ID: 20220729211525.GW15006@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:27:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Rebased to cope with the recent changes in this area.
>
> Please find attached an updated version of this patch, where I have
> extended the support of the upgrade script down to 9.5 as origin
> version, as ~9.4 now fail because of cluster_name, so Cluster.pm does
> not support that. FWIW, I have created an extra set of dumps down to
> 9.4.

This was using the old psql rather than the new one.
Before v10, psql didn't have \if.

I think Cluster.pm should be updated to support the upgrades that upgrade.sh
supported. I guess it ought to be fixed in v15.

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-more-filtering-capabilities-in-the-dumps.patch text/x-diff 5.5 KB
0002-WIP-old-versions.patch text/x-diff 3.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-07-29 21:17:08 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-07-29 21:13:21 Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade