Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
Date: 2022-07-26 16:33:39
Message-ID: 20220726163339.4mpr5fce7ytbshs5@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-May-08, Andres Freund wrote:

> On 2022-05-08 13:59:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > No one is going to thank us for shipping a known-unstable test case.
>
> IDK, hiding failures indicating bugs isn't really better, at least if it
> doesn't look like a bug in the test. But you seem to have a stronger opinion
> on this than me, so I'll skip the entire test for now :/

Hey, I just noticed that these tests are still disabled. The next
minors are coming soon; should we wait until *those* are done and then
re-enable; or re-enable them now to see how they fare and then
re-disable before the next minors if there's still problems we don't
find fixes for?

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"How strange it is to find the words "Perl" and "saner" in such close
proximity, with no apparent sense of irony. I doubt that Larry himself
could have managed it." (ncm, http://lwn.net/Articles/174769/)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-07-26 16:46:07 Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2022-07-26 16:29:05 Re: Fix annotations nextFullXid