From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |
Date: | 2022-07-15 12:03:11 |
Message-ID: | 20220715120311.3z6g2nqqdtiurlbp@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Jul-15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> However, looking closer I noticed that on Windows we use our own
> readdir() implementation, which AFAICT includes everything to handle
> reparse points as symlinks correctly in get_dirent_type. Which means
> that do_pg_start_backup is wasting its time with the "#ifdef WIN32" bits
> to handle junction points separately. We could just do this
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> index b809a2152c..4966213fde 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> @@ -8302,13 +8302,8 @@ do_pg_backup_start(const char *backupidstr, bool fast, TimeLineID *starttli_p,
> * we sometimes use allow_in_place_tablespaces to create
> * directories directly under pg_tblspc, which would fail below.
> */
> -#ifdef WIN32
> - if (!pgwin32_is_junction(fullpath))
> - continue;
> -#else
> if (get_dirent_type(fullpath, de, false, ERROR) != PGFILETYPE_LNK)
> continue;
> -#endif
>
> #if defined(HAVE_READLINK) || defined(WIN32)
> rllen = readlink(fullpath, linkpath, sizeof(linkpath));
>
> And everything should continue to work.
Hmm, but it does not:
https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4824963784900608
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-07-15 12:16:58 | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-07-15 11:58:56 | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |