From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
Date: | 2022-07-07 07:26:59 |
Message-ID: | 20220707.162659.422073547959031915.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 7 Jul 2022 01:11:33 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
>
>
> On 2022/03/16 10:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:19:13 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> >> In short, I split out the two topics other than checkpoint log to
> >> other threads.
> > So, this is about the main topic of this thread, adding LSNs to
> > checkpint log. Other topics have moved to other treads [1], [2] ,
> > [3].
> > I think this is no longer controversial alone. So this patch is now
> > really Read-for-Commiter and is waiting to be picked up.
>
> +1
>
> + * ControlFileLock is not required as we are the only
> + * updator of these variables.
>
> Isn't it better to add "at this time" or something at the end of the
> comment because only we're not always updator of them? No?
Excluding initialization, (I believe) checkpointer is really the only
updator of the variables/members. But I'm fine with the addition.
> Barring any objection, I'm thinking to apply the above small change
> and commit the patch.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | talk to ben | 2022-07-07 07:45:46 | Re: archive modules |
Previous Message | talk to ben | 2022-07-07 07:08:39 | Re: archive modules |