Re: doc: BRIN indexes and autosummarize

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Roberto Mello <roberto(dot)mello(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: doc: BRIN indexes and autosummarize
Date: 2022-07-06 07:45:31
Message-ID: 20220706074531.oiuhmmb2oub5zuch@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Jul-05, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> One issue:
>
> + summarized range, the range that the new page belongs into
> + does not automatically acquire a summary tuple;
>
> "belongs into" sounds wrong - "belongs to" is better.

Hah, and I was wondering if "belongs in" was any better.

> I'll put that change into my "typos" branch to fix later if it's not addressed
> in this thread.

Roberto has some more substantive comments on the new text, so let's try
and fix everything together. This time, I'll let you guys come up with
a new patch.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-07-06 07:52:08 Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-06 07:27:57 Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~